Pyramids - the right way up and otherwise

Have you ever wondered at pyramids? I've been wondering at them. Clearly the death cult thinks that they're a big deal. They like them so much they whacked one on the number one piece of paper, the US dollar bill. Sure enough whenever there's some illuminati symbolism going on there'll have to be a pyramid in there somewhere. We are that, they say.


First up, let me declare that 'pyramids' here refers to those of the Egyptian variety - four-sided, pointy topped, and classically dimensioned. Whilst I expect that the death cult would have grooved on the blood sacrifice, they otherwise seem uninterested in pyramids of the American variety. Hmm... perhaps that's as good a starting point as any: Why is the death cult so taken with the Egyptian pyramids but not with the American ones?

First up there's the antiquity. The Egyptian pyramids date from over 4500 years ago to 3500. The American ones started just over 3000 years ago and continued through until 1200 years ago. Whilst this might seem like a who-cares, those who've declared themselves chosen by God (Jews, royals, etc), perhaps hounded by a well-what-did-you-expect insecurity, have always chosen to make a big deal of such things. Certainly there's the inevitability of what passes for pissing contests amongst the kiddy-raping elite, but perhaps there's also a Big Lie function to it? Since there is no argument to support such an absurd proposition (ie. chosen by God) there is only one technique to squelch doubts brought about by objections, and that is: restate the claims bigger and louder. Oh, and kill whomever made the objections, ha ha. Anyway biggest equals best and loudest equals 'most true'.


Apart from the great antiquity, we shouldn't forget that America is just the wrong part of the world. With the absolute tippety-top part of our pyramidal death cult comprising a series of families who allege themselves descendants of Abraham, the New World was never going to get a guernsey. Meanwhile back in the Old World, let's not argue over Egypt, Babylon, Judea, whatever - let's just say that the Middle East (otherwise self-servingly known as the 'cradle of civilization') was always going to be 'it'.

Back to the pyramids now. Or more specifically back to the look of them. American pyramids are visually cluttered. They're busily stepped with an extra wee building on top. Clearly they're examples of 'form follows function'. Even a know-nothing could figure the function out - climb the steps and um... nice view, lovely spot for lunch don't you think? Egyptian pyramids on the other hand are a cypher. What is the function of their form? If there's no access in or out is there any function at all? Confusion reigns.


And there you have it. The function of the Egyptian pyramid is to inspire bafflement. These 'edifices' weren't built for anyone's 'edification', if you can dig it. They were made so that a single self-obsessed individual could remain as touch-me-not in death as he was in life.

May we place all this under the topic heading 'sneakiness? In Egyptian pyramids all the action is hidden. In American ones, none of it is. In fact for a majority of American pyramids the interior is merely earth with a stone facing - they have no hidden interior chambers. What you see is what you get. Egyptian pyramids on the other hand go beyond the facade and actually take 'hidden' one step further - half of their hidden passages and chambers are false ones. Truly they're the perfect symbol for the death cult - the truth is absent, all is hidden, and half of that is false as well.

And all of it a monument to hubristic self-regard. Perfect.

---

There's more to pyramids than that of course. There's also pyramids as metaphors, as in 'a pyramidal structure' - which is to say, a paramount leader at the top, under him or her: 2IC's, 3IC's, and so on and so forth all the way down to the lumpen masses.


Curiously enough, the death cult's beloved Egyptian pyramids do not function in this fashion at all. There is no chamber at the top. The pyramid as such is merely a dead end tomb - nothing goes on within it. Furthermore, the only chamber that isn't bullshit is in the centre of the pyramid: a place that in the metaphor is possessed of no great significance. But since pyramids are, above and beyond all else, all about misrepresentation this should come as no surprise.

Hmm... time for a brief detour into 'tension and compression'. Apologies to those completely familiar with the subject but since the next bit of this piece pivots on this concept I think I should lay it out. In construction, all materials function as one or the other - tension or compression (or both, as is the case with steel, which is why it's such an amazing material). Stone on the other hand is all compression. You can pile tons of weight on it and it will not fold up or flop about. Its opposite, tension, is best exemplified in rope or cable. You can hang things from them and they will not snap in a brittle fashion. Sure enough, there are no tow-cables made of stone, and there are no pillars made of rope.


Never mind the idiot non-examples, the classic construction operating under tension principles would have to be the suspension bridge. And (the topic at last) the classic example of compression construction is the pyramid. An Egyptian pyramid doesn't have a single tensile member in it. Nada. It's just a pile of rocks, one on top of the other, and each holding up those above it. And what with being unable to topple over, pyramids make Stonehenge look flimsy.

What does this have to do with pyramids as metaphors? Our metaphoric pyramid functions as a command structure - everything comes from the top down. But let's not forget that the actual pyramids were for no other purpose than to protect privilege and wealth: and so it is with metaphoric pyramidal structures. Power equals wealth and privilege, and all flows upwards.


'All flows upwards'. It does? What a strange thing to say. How does anything 'flow' upwards? It can't obviously - nothing flows upwards. Things only flow down. Or 'trickle down', if you prefer, ha ha ha. Hmm... what's going on here? Trickle down is a con and we all know it. Here we are in the greatest transfer of wealth in history and there is no trickle down. The wealth only 'rises'. I ask the otherwise foolish question - by what means does this take place in a compression structure? If we are the stones in a pyramid how is our wealth pulled upwards? Stones giving blood is one thing, having the blood defy the law of gravity is another.

Unless there's something wrong with the metaphor? This may sound stupid but are we stones or aren't we? This is an ancient Egyptian pyramid yes? Surely in the metaphor we are held in place because of gravity acting upon us and upon our neighbours, each of which, by way of friction, prevents us from going sideways. At the risk of stating the complete bloody obvious, humans aren't stones. We are bipedal mammals - We've got two legs from our hips to the ground, and, when we move them they walk around (thank you Terry Jones). Or to put it another way: we are capable of going many places not least of which is 'away'. Okay, so if our death cult pyramid is so hateful, why don't we?

It's true that we are to some extent possessed of a compression-like gravity-influenced inertia and this will hold us in place. But really isn't this immediate discussion one of bondage? What's bondage about, if it isn't ropes, fetters, and chains? And these are the very definition of articles of tension, surely. Okay so how does that square with a pyramid entirely free of tension members? It doesn't obviously. And besides, what logic is there to pyramid built with chains? The whole idea is silly: it wouldn't stand up for starters.


But! It's only silly if we believe that the death cult's pyramid is what they say it is. And more fools we, since we know that the death cult lie like they breathe and that the Egyptian pyramid was only ever about misrepresentation anyway. Why not take that obvious step and reject the death cult's symbolic use of the pyramid, as a complete sham? To hell with their pyramid reaching to the heavens with its eye of Horus seeing all of creation. A pyramid made of chains with wealth and power trickling to the pointy end cannot exist as the death cult declares. It can only work in a fashion that, as sure as night follows day, they'd have to misrepresent.

Do you get it? A pyramid of chains with all wealth flowing to the pointy end cannot stand 'up'. It cannot reach to the heavens. Hell, it doesn't even get to see daylight. The death cult's pyramid is in truth an inverted pyramid. It hangs down into an abyss. The pointy end is not the top but the bottom. Does trickle-down make sense now? Which is all very well, but what is trickling down exactly?

---

Just a moment. That's weird - are we in yin/yang, light/dark, good/evil territory here? Is it possible we can lay this on the continuum? That would be nice because it's been ages since it scored a mention. (It's at the top of the page by the way). So! What if a pyramid is neither good nor bad without selfishness/selflessness making it so? A selfless pyramid might reach Olympian heights with whomever has shed the most, and thus disencumbered themselves for the climb, arriving at a point where they can see all manner of distant marvels, the whole of creation laid out before them. Tell me that that doesn't make sense. Those at the top who've shed desire and are uninterested in sucking blood give no one below any cause to leave, with gravity no great oppression.


And then there's the death cult. Their pyramid is made of chains and hangs down. It reaches not to heaven but to hell. The eye of Horus is in truth the arsehole (no seriously, it is). Their view from the arse-end of their upside-down pyramid is horribly limited. Looking up, all they can see is people's nether regions - their world a shit-stained skyscape of puckered pink wrinkly bits. Perverse anti-sexuality is all that they see and all that they know. Not forgetting the 'trickle-down' constantly obscuring their vision. The trickle-down is of course, shit and piss and blood and tears. Or it's wealth. Whatever... it's all good to the death cult. They'll take whatever's going. Not forgetting satanists' predilection for human waste products...

Besides which, wealth is also subject to its own duality and may absolutely function as shit. Whilst the death cult's symbols and metaphors are lies to fool those of us not in it, what they don't understand is how they've fooled themselves first and foremost. The shit wealth that flows down and accumulates with the Rothschilds and their very good friends doesn't so much free them of the chains that everyone else is forced to wear, rather it stands in for them. Every drop of this golden shit equals a drop of fear. Drop upon drop calcifying into an ever thicker armour. And God knows they'll need it since the more they have the more there is to fear.


Gee whiz, that's the death cult for you isn't it? An eyeless pallid waxy corpse entombed in an upside-down pyramid of shit-encrusted chains, the pitch black mistaken for daylight, the fetid stink for perfume, the screams for cheers - everything turned arse-about, a Potemkin world for the self. The only certainty is change is met with a snort of derision, a flash of anger, a twinkling of fear. Their dead eyes rove their arse-about world and they rejoice in their own hype about the pyramids of elsewhere - built of stone, lasting forever, so reassuring...